Thursday, 13 December 2012

PR vs. Propaganda: that’s a wrap!



In this blog series, I have focused on specific aspects of Public Relations and analysed the sometimes negative stigma which surrounds the industry. By delving deeper into these ideas, I hope to have changed any misconceptions and provided some thought-provoking discussions.

Answering my original question – is PR and propaganda the same concept? In my personal opinion, no, but it’s undeniable that the profession that we now know has emerged from the notion of propaganda. Do I think propaganda still exists? Yes I do, but I also believe we are smart enough to distinguish the sublime from the ridiculous. The impression of the PR industry stems from our ethics, knowledge base and most importantly our personal opinion. In other words, propaganda will always exist if we believe it to.

Nevertheless, these are just my individual views – maybe it’s time you find yours!

Over and Out (but not for too long!)
Rhi [@Rhiannon_Lucy91]

Sunday, 2 December 2012

Part Four: Trust me. I'm a celebrity endorsement


Does truth stem from trust or does trust stem from truth? It’s safe to say this ‘chicken-egg’ debate will leave the masses divided. If you’re asking for my opinion I would defend the notion that truth derives from trust. As babies we are blank canvases moulded (influenced) by those around whom we trust. At first this is your parents, then friends, maybe work colleagues and (though it pains me to admit this) the influence of the media.

Whether you like it or not we’re all caught in the media trap, one element that automatically springs to mind is the ‘C factor’ – the celebrity stamp of approval. Julianne Schultz (2004) declares “stars, lies and propaganda have become the stock in trade of public life, distorting reality, unhinging trust in institutions and corroding confidence.” Despite her bold claims, is it really fair to associate all celebrity PR with personal gain or spin?

Shannon & Weaver’s (1949) model of communication emphasises this idea of ‘encoding’ and ‘decoding’, in other words, ensuring your sender and receiver are on the same page. Given our obession with those in the spotlight, is this a form of manipulation or just a smart PR move?

When I witness Ryan Reynolds in some smouldering fragrance advert, am I tempted to purchase this particular aftershave for my man? Possibly. Maybe because in my dreams I’m in the advert with this Adonis? Probably. The sad fact is that like our parents, certain celebrities become our influencers, role models and (if you’re like me and Ryan Reynolds) a small crush gone bad. Some might say this sort of campaigning resembles the work of Edward Bernays and ‘The American Tobacco Company’ in the 1920s. Maybe not to the same extent but the idea of using ‘idealisation’ definitely plays its role.

It’s easy for me to jest at this ‘spin doctor’ concept when it involves a product of relatively low involvement, but what if the stakes are higher? Many celebrities over the years have promoted charities; their endorsement has not only heightened the profile of said charities but also helped to raise the big bucks. A recent example can be seen through Stand up to Cancer which made its debut in October this year. Would this campaign have had the same exposure without the participation of these stars? Unlikely. Could we call the concept of celebrity PR spin when it involves a charity? This isn’t exactly an idea that has crossed my mind but what happens when celebrity endorsement reaches the world of politics?

Where authors (Drake & Higgins: 2006) have accepted the value celebrity endorsement can bring to the world of politics, Schultz argues that as the world of politics and entertainment merges “the addiction to celebrity has become more acute, more corrosive.” The US election which took place earlier this year, during which many celebrities from George Clooney to Katy Perry supported the current (and re-elected) President Barack Obama, provides a recent example of this. Seeing Presidents on chat shows and celebrities supporting political campaigns may be a little hard to take in but does this actually make sound business sense?


Cutlip et al (2000) considers democracy and PR to go hand in hand.  “In a very real sense, the purpose of democracy itself closely matches the purpose of public relations. Successful democratic government maintains responsive relationships with constituents, based on mutual understanding and two-way communication.” In this sense we could deem lobbying as a fundamental communication technque used to initiate mutual understanding and feedback.

Richard Perloff (2010) developed 5 elements of credibility and social attractiveness which evaluate suitable speakers to a particular audience or set of publics.
  • ·         Expertise
  • ·         Trustworthiness
  • ·         Likeability
  • ·         Similarity
  • ·         Physical appearance

Credibility is vital within PR. This form of persuasion looks at how to communicate a message in the most effective way. Given critics' views on the validity of our profession there is no wonder many have invited celebrity endorsements with open arms.

Tweet, review, discuss

Over and Out
Rhi [@Rhiannon_Lucy91]